Mac Mini For Editing Hd Video
Multimedia professionals rely on solid tools to get the job done, and those tools have typically been Apple’s Mac lineup. But as Apple shifts its focus more to its MacBooks and iPhones, it’s neglected a tiny, but important product: the Mac mini. Why am I singling out the lowly? Because it’s currently the only desktop in the entire Apple lineup to play in the under $1,000 price point; an important psychological barrier for many computer shoppers. It’s also an important barrier for enthusiast multimedia shooters who aren't filling studios with $3,000 that haven’t been updated significantly in years. The Mac mini has been an easy-to-live-with photo and video editor for years. Even with its meager integrated graphics chips, with a few careful upgrades even a demanding shooter can edit batches of photos and full HD video with ease.
One of the high one screen out of the all Best Monitors for Mac Mini. BenQ Monitor for Photo and Video Editing: Price – $599.00. ASUS 27” Full HD Monitor for Mac Mini under 300. ASUS Full HD Display compatible with your Mac mini, Easy setup on HDMI cable connection. Frameless design makes impressive viewing experience (178 degrees Wide. Oct 30, 2015 Does anyone use a mac mini for photo editing? I'm considering a Mac Mini 3.0Ghz & 16Gb Ram. Can I ask what files you edit with your mac mini? How big are they? Using Lightroom and Photoshop. I also use it to edit HD video from the D600 using Final Cut Pro X. Photoshop performance - I have no issues with this at all, and the times I've.
But the enthusiasts have moved forward. People are shooting 4K video on their DSLRs, and at, why not try out 4K, 360-video shooting? Well, you won't be trying it on a Mac mini, with its slow dual-core processor and integrated graphics.
Why the Mac mini Needs to Raise Its Game The natural reaction would be to say “Get an iMac” but anything even close to $1,000 from Apple is woefully underpowered by today's standards and has a small screen that isn’t a Retina display. The kicker is that the integrated graphics on that won't get you to the land of smooth 4K and 360 video editing.
It’s amongst editors in these new mediums, the hobbyist/enthusiast/semi-pro adding new 360/VR tools to their toolbox, that Apple is losing the most mindshare. One of the most popular headsets out there, the Oculus Rift, because of middling graphics cards. If you walk into one of the premiere incubators of 360 video/VR work, you’ll find all machines, except for the one lonely iMac that doesn’t run any headsets. New editors coming onto the scene are not starting out on Apples and will likely never get to experience them. That’s bad for Apple in the long run. As someone who taught photojournalism at a school with an entirely Nikon-based consignment, I saw that graduating students carried their preferences learned in school with them to the professional world.
More students of mine ended up with Nikons just because it’s what they knew. Bang for the Buck Someone buying into a system to edit 360-video can see that something like this will match a, at least on paper. When you spec out a loaded Mac mini, it costs more than a capable PC and it still can’t do the basics for this medium. Why would anyone pay these prices when the performance for multimedia editors isn't there?
I’ve been a Mac user for a long time, and I wanted to believe that Apple had the 360 enthusiast willing to drop a grand covered, at least if they spent money on a new machine in 2017. So I gave it a shot, judiciously upgrading a Mac mini, adding a solid state hard drive into the mix along with 16 GB of memory. The Mac mini only offers older dual core i5 and i7 processors anyway so I didn’t make the upgrade there. How to format a usb flash drive for mac and pc. Even at this modest level, I was already. The Apple store employee who helped me configure the machine expressed cautious optimism that the machine would be up to scratch.
I loaded up my, added the and got cracking, only to find that editing 360 footage from a (4K, not even the higher 5.7K the camera is capable of) was an exercise in frustration, with stuttering footage and dropped frames everywhere. Even simply playing back the footage in the resulted in the same issues. I then pit the Mac mini against the above-mentioned, less expensive model, which tore through the footage in Adobe Premiere Pro without breaking a sweat, likely thanks to its dedicated graphics card.
If Asus can cram all of hardware this into a box the size of a Playstation, I’m sure Apple could have worked something out for a Mac mini. As an unexpected bonus, I discovered that Microsoft is in tune with 360-video.
It’s natively supported in the Windows 10 movie player, and the Edge browser works with 360 as well. Safari can’t claim that and Apple doesn't natively support 360-video in Sierra. It’s clear that Apple is on shaky ground in its lower-priced machines when it comes to supporting the next generation of multimedia editors. While upper-echelon iMacs are capable machines, Apple ignores entry and mid-level users at their own peril. I would not recommend a Mac Mini to anyone. Have them build a PC with much more Power that will last them forever and can be upgraded.
Yes, computers can all edit 4K 360 video using proxies but at what cost. Whos going to edit and render/export video if it takes 16 hours? It's just not worth it and over the years Apple has soldered the Ram Memory on the board so there is no way to upgrade the system. I'm almost 99.9% sure Apple is ending the life of this line. Apple is an All in one company, they don't even make cinema displays anymore. Why do so many people still using Macs for editing? PCs are soooo much faster and flexible, I really dont get it.
$0.80 per day. And how much do those packages cost? Construction cost estimating software for mac. Less than you might pay for a coffee at Starbucks.
I dont care if the computer is in a alluminium housing it must perform and get the job done. The Mac Mini is slow and expensive 2. The iMac is expensive and you need an additional screen for color work.
If the hardware is getting old you need to buy a complete new iMac (also if you are satisfied with the screen). The MacPro had years old hardware and has horrible possibilites to upgrade). So where is the point to buy a Mac for professional work these days?
I am looking to buy either an imac or a mac mini for the sole purpose of HD video editing for music videos. Hard drive space will not be an issue as I will be editing of an external hard drive. I've read differing opinions on whether or not the new mac mini can properly handle HD video.
It was my understanding, that as long as it has 4 GB of RAM, then HD video shouldnt be a problem. The output times of the video aren't that big of a deal - these clips will be 5-10 minutes in length. To get the most bang out of my buck just for video editing, what should I get - imac or the new mac mini? Also, I've heard that final cut pro cannot operate on the mac mini due to not having the graphics card to run it?
Is this true? Thanks for your help. In the end, I want to keep my costs as minimal as possible, and use Final Cut Pro if I can. I will be editing clips filmed with the canon 5d and 7d.
Click to expand.That is not true, FCP 7 runs on integrated GPUs too, I ran it on my 2009 MBP with the 9400M and was also able to run it on my 2008 White MacBook with its Intel IGP. Even Motion and Color run on an IGP, but perform much better with a dedicated GPU. The Mac mini is perfectly capable to be an editing machine, even without a dedicated GPU. Even Motion and Color will run on it, though it will run slower. The advantage of the iMac is its 1920 x 1080 resolution and the faster and bigger internal HDD, the desktop CPU and the GPU, thus if you can get your hand on one and don't have a big external display, get the iMac. I'd get the iMac.
Just because you CAN do something, doesn't mean you SHOULD. I've edited on a Mac Mini before and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone - maybe in desperation, but not as a long term proposition. The iMac is a much better option.
You'll want to transcode your H264 files from the 5D and 7D to ProRes 422 using either Compressor or MPEG Streamclip and edit using the ProRes files as H264 is not the best format to edit with. Also, you should look into Magic Bullet Grinder ($49) which will enable you to add timecode to your clips and thus Media Manage them at the end of your edits to save disk space. Hope this helps. Firstly the more powerful your computer the easier it is going to be to edit in HD. Of course the mac mini will edit, it's a mac after all, but at times it will chug along. Unfortunately it has a lousy graphics card, and FCP 7 won't like it much, and certain effects simply won't work.
If you're using the 5D or 7D for shooting then what ever mac you get, make sure you download Canon's FCP plug-in for importing, as it lets you import files straight from the SD card via Log and Transfer. PLEASE don't waist your time, going around the houses, by using MPEG Streamclip or Compressor! ProRes 422 Light, is more than good enough for 24/25/30P from Canon cameras, though the full ProRes 422 is great if you have the drive speed and space.